COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE

Burlington, Vermont  

Brownfields | CDBG | VISTA | Site Map | CEDO Home | City Home

 
  Burlington A to Z   A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z  
Housing Business Community Waterfront  
 
 BUSINESS
  2008 Chittenden County
  Business Survey Results
   
 Business Main Page
   
 
  
  Google logo 
 
 
 


2008 Chittenden County Business Survey Results

Executive Summary

The Chittenden County Business Survey is completed periodically by Burlington’s Community and Economic Development Office. The survey was last taken in 1994, and results from this 2008 update were compared to past findings. Surveys were distributed to 84 of the largest employers in the county and ultimately completed by 25% of these organizations. Questions included demographic information, such as company size, employees, and expected growth, as well as organizational needs, covering assistance, recruitment, and training, energy conservation, and advantages and disadvantages of operating in the area.

While companies are cautious about the national economic climate, particularly energy costs, most appear stable and continue to plan moderate growth. No organization surveyed plans to relocate outside of Vermont, although more are planning to expand outside Chittenden County. Businesses also rate quality of life as the best factor of operating in the region, a strong indicator in Burlington’s ability to retain and attract new companies to the area.

There do exist some opportunities to improve conditions. Most businesses have few difficulties recruiting workers and appreciate the quality of schools and the labor force; however, there remains a challenge in finding sufficient workers with technical, engineering, or scientific skills. By further improving training programs, the regions can enable more residents to find these well-paying jobs. While many companies are worried about energy costs, over 80% are also already working to conserve energy and 70% are interested in learning about new opportunities. The region’s strong network of local energy and environmental agencies will also be an asset to this process.

The Chittenden County Survey Results are also available in a printable PDF version.PDF  For the PDF version, you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader.  If you do not have a current copy of this free software, you can download it now

Introduction and Methods

Surveys of a number of the largest employers of Chittenden County have been completed periodically by the Burlington Community and Economic Development Office. Since the last survey in 1994, however, there have been significant changes within Burlington and the region. This 2008 update is valuable both in its comparative value to the 1994 survey and on its own, as the City of Burlington works to determine how it can best support and sustain a healthy regional business climate.

The 84 businesses which employed the greatest number of people in Chittenden County were mailed a pre-notification of the 2008 survey, which followed in the mail. Companies could either return the paper copy of this survey or complete an identical survey on-line. Organizations that failed to return the survey were given follow-up phone calls, which ultimately obtained a 25% response rate. The businesses that responded include a mix of the area's many different industries, including production, manufacturing, scientific/technical, social services, temporary agencies, and retail establishments.

General Demographics

While the average company in 2008 is somewhat larger than in 1994 and the survey size somewhat smaller, most responses to the survey did not deviate significantly from past views. More companies own space than lease, to be expected with larger companies. Similarly with finance, these companies either can obtain or don’t need most types of available capital.

A few exceptions to this general trend were found in the need for financing. Given the companies surveyed are generally larger than those surveyed in 1994, that fewer companies need financing could either result from their size or from efforts to improve capital availability. A greater percentage of the 2008 businesses also own their own locations and plan to increase their employees by a greater amount, both of which are also likely caused by their greater size. General business demographics and financing information can be found below.

Business Demographics
  2008 Respondents 1994 Respondents
  Total Average Median Total Average
Respondents 21     76  
Independently Owned (n=20) 80%     92.1%  
2008 Full-Time Employment (n=20) 4137 197 157 3227 47
Growth in Full-Time Employment 2004-2007/1991-1994 (n=19) 643 34 10 265 4
Expected Growth in Full-Time Employment 2007-2010/1994-1997 (n=18) 572 32 10 539 9
Size (sq.ft.) (n=18) 933,006 51,834 42,500 947,691 13,348
Own* 74%     44%  
Lease* 58%     58%  
Percent of Available Space Utilized (n=18) 96%     92%  
*Does not add to 100% because some respondents both own and lease.

 

Financing
  Able to Obtain Tried but Turned Down Haven't Tried but Need Don't Need
  2008 1994 2008 1994 2008 1994 2008 1994
Working Capital 68% 59% 0% 15% 5% 5% 26% 20%
Equipment Loan 61% 53% 0% 8% 0% 3% 39% 36%
Commercial/Industrial Mortgage 63% 40% 0% 1% 0% 7% 37% 51%
Venture Capital 6% 18% 0% 12% 0% 6% 94% 64%

Expansion Plans

A key factor in retaining businesses in Burlington and Chittenden County is understanding where local companies choose to expand, as well as their reasons for doing so. Since 1994, there are several trends worth exploring when observing business expansion plans. A significant number of companies are no longer planning to expand at their current site, and the number which plan to expand at a new site in Burlington remains small. There is some positive news in that fewer companies plan to relocate outside of Vermont, but more plan to relocate out of Chittenden County. The size difference in companies surveyed may partially explain this trend; given that large regional employers may plan to expand statewide while remaining in Vermont, but nonetheless, the trend is positive.

Expansion Plans (n=18)
  2008 Total 2008 % 1994 %
Planning to expand 13 72.22% 78.70%
At current site 5 27.78% 52.50%
At a new site in Burlington 1 5.56% 8.50%
At a new site outside of Burlington but within Chittenden County 3 16.67% 27.10%
At a new site outside of Chittenden County but in Vermont 5 27.78% 10.20%
Relocate outside of Vermont 0 0.00% 25.40%

The chart below catalogues the given reasons for companies' expansion predictions (for those planning to expand outside of Chittenden County). The top three reasons given in both years are Closer Proximity to Markets, Land/Building Availability, and Taxes. While taxes moved from first to third from 1994 to 2008, (a positive sign as it is more challenging for government policy to affect the other two expansion factors), that taxes continue to remain a disadvantage for businesses is a challenge which more can still be done to address.

Reasons for Expanding Outside of Chittenden County (n=9)
  Total 2008 Rank 1994 Rank
Closer Proximity of Markets 6 1 2
Land/Building Availability and Cost 4 2 3
Taxes 2 3 1
Transportation Consideration 2 4 4
Labor Availability 2 5 6
Labor Costs 1 6 5
Other: Program Convenience 1 7  
Closer Proximity of Suppliers 0 8 7
Access to Financing 0 9 8

Business Assistance Organizations

To measure firms’ perceptions of local business assistance organizations, the survey asked whether businesses had used any of a number of local business assistance organizations, and if so, what was their opinion of the services they had received. There were relatively few differences between 1994 and 2008. More than three-quarters of businesses were familiar with the Chamber of Commerce, UVM, and the Vermont Economic Development Authority (VEDA). More than 25% of businesses had used these three companies, Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation (GBIC), and the Vermont Economic Development Department (VEDD).

Of these most-used companies, all except UVM received at least a 66% favorable response rating. The highest favorable rating was received by GBIC, and the Chamber of Commerce has the highest increase in favorable ratings, moving from 53% in 1994 to 74% in 2008. The sample sizes of businesses who had used each organization were too small to adequately determine whether opinions had changed significantly, but overall, both familiarity and opinion appeared to match up relatively evenly.

Firms' Opinions of Business Assistance Organizations % Favorable Response
Chamber of Commerce (n=15) Favorable Neutral Unfavorable 2008 1994
Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation (n=8) 11 4 0 73.33% 52.9%
University of Vermont (n=13) 7 0 1 87.5% 91.7%
Small Business Administrative Loans (n=4) 8 4 1 61.54% 60%
Vermont Economic Development Authority (n=8) 2 2 0 50% 92.3%
Small Business Development Center (n=1) 6 1 1 75% 90.9%
Vermont Economic Development Department (n=6) 0 1 0 0% 28.6%
Small Business Innovation Research (n=0) 4 1 1 66.67% 60%
Burlington Economic Development Office (n=5) 0 0 0 N/A 50%
US Department of Commerce (n=3) 3 2 0 60% 80%
Federal/State Export Program (n=1) 3 0 0 100% 60%
Vermont Job Start (n=1) 0 1 0 0% 66.7%
Burlington Revolving Loan Program (n=0) 0 0 1 0% 66.7%
  0 0 0 0% 0%
 
Firms' Familiarity with Business Assistance Organizations % not Familiar
  Used Familiar Not Familiar 2008 1994
Chamber of Commerce (n=20) 15 5 0 0.00% 8.60%
Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation (n=19) 8 6 5 26.32% 11.40%
University of Vermont (n=20) 13 5 2 10.00% 16.90%
Small Business Administrative Loans (n=19) 4 9 6 31.58% 4.20%
Vermont Economic Development Authority (n=19) 8 8 3 15.79% 19.70%
Small Business Development Center (n=19) 1 10 8 42.11% 41.40%
Vermont Economic Development Department (n-19) 6 8 5 26.32% 31.90%
Small Business Innovation Research (n=19) 9 8 11 57.89% 49.30%
Burlington Economic Development Office (n=19) 5 7 7 36.84% 21.10%
US Department of Commerce (n=19) 3 11 5 26.32% 35.30%
Federal/State Export Program (n=19) 1 8 10 52.63% 30.00%
Vermont Job Start (n=19) 1 12 6 31.58% 47.10%
Burlington Revolving Loan Program (n=19) 0 6 13 68.42% 58.00%

Recruitment

While unemployment has remained relatively low in the past decade, one of the main challenges in supporting businesses and workers remains understanding the characteristics of occupations in high demand. This understanding, particularly of any major shifts over time, can enable new training programs and other efforts to assist the business and labor markets.

The results from this survey question show a general trend where employers have the most difficulty finding qualified workers with technical, engineering, and scientific skills. This field has greatly increased since 1994, when there was only moderate demand for these workers. There also remains relatively strong demand for skilled and semi-skilled production workers, although this has declined since the last survey, likely caused by the continued decline in manufacturing. Unskilled, clerical, and administrative/managerial employees have remained relatively easy for businesses to find; however, sales and marketing employees have become significantly easier to find since 1994. Likely causes of these effects include the increased general education levels of Burlington and Chittenden County residents and the student population, which supports a large supply of unskilled, clerical, and sales workers. This clear disparity between technical and professional/pre-professional work suggests that continued training programs for technical fields may yield significant results, as there remains a high demand for these workers.

Companies with Recruiting Challenges by Employee Type
  2008 (n=17) 1994
Technical 9 7
Engineering and Scientific 9 4
Skilled Production 7 14
Semi-skilled Production 4 6
Sales and Marketing 4 16
Unskilled 4 3
Clerical 3 4
Administrative/Managerial 3 3
Other: Clinical 1  
Other: Human Service Professionals 1  

Training Needs

Responses to whether specialized employee training would be helpful led to less clear results than the previous question on recruitment. Each company had a different protocol; a significant number of organizations responded that they completed all employee training internally or had no interest in training assistance. Businesses that did respond had an even balance between the same need for managerial and production employee training. For management, companies were primarily interested in general Management Training and Problem Analysis Techniques. Production employee training focused on technical skills such as CNC Operation, Blueprint Reading, and Computer Aided Drawing or Manufacturing.

Specialized Training Needs (n=12)
 

Total

Management  
Management Training 5
Problem Analysis Techniques 4
Waste Disposal and Recycling 3
Strategic Planning 2
Creating Flexible Work Teams 2
Transportation 1
Production  
CNC Operation 4
Blueprint Reading 4
Computer Aided Drawing or Manufacturing 3
Basic Math 2
Programming 2
Other: Health Information 1
Other: Tolerance 1

Energy Use and Conservation

A new section on the 2008 business survey asked about energy use and conservation, expanding on two questions originally in the demographics section of the 1994 survey. Given the recent increase in energy prices, and as Burlington updates its Climate Action Plan, understanding local companies’ views on energy use can provide a baseline for future efforts to help businesses cut costs and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. The responses to this survey question were largely positive. 84% of companies agree or strongly agree that energy is a major cost for their organization, twice as many as in 1994, and nearly 75% of companies agree or strongly agree that they would be interested in learning more about energy conservation programs, up from 47% in 1994. Again, over 80% and 90% of companies surveyed respectively agree or strongly agree that their organization is already working to reduce their energy use and that energy reduction programs would benefit their company.

Energy Use and Conservation % Agree
  Strongly
Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
2008 1994
Energy is a major cost for our organization (n=19) 10 6 2 1 0 84.2% 38.7%
Energy reduction programs would benefit our organization (n=17) 7 9 1 0 0 94.1%  
Our organization is interested in learning more about energy conservation programs (n=15) 4 7 4 0 0 73.3% 47.1%
Our organization is already working to reduce our energy use (n=19) 10 6 3 0 0 84.2%  

Best Factors of Operating in the Region

Both the structural and perceived benefits and challenges of operating in the region are important in attracting and retaining businesses. What companies view as the best features of the region include some that have been promoted along with others that may have been overlooked. By examining these views, Burlington has the opportunity to possibly brand or further advertise certain opportunities while publicly addressing or solving the difficulties that have been raised.

Quality of life is by far the greatest advantage seen by companies to operate in the area, with 72% of respondents referring to it as an advantage and none as a disadvantage. This response moved from being ranked 5th in 1994 to first in 2008, where it received more than twice as many votes as any other category. This is an area where the region can continue to use this reputation to attract more companies that appreciate this value (and who will in turn support efforts to retain and improve this feature). Burlington also has the opportunity to modify its definition of what quality of life includes, whether this is environmental sustainability or livable wages. Additional positives to this include that the rank of companies referring to this as an asset of operating in the area increased from 5th place in 1994 to 1st in 2008.

While availability of labor and quality of schools are seen as positive by a number of companies, others are still having significant difficulty recruiting qualified applicants (as seen in the list of the most challenging operating factors). This disparity may indicate a gap either in the types of employees the companies recruit or that more needs to be done outside of traditional educational methods in providing needed skills and matching jobs and qualified employees. Telecommunications has also declined slightly as an asset, as has utilities capacity. These factors remain a net positive for operating in the region; however, a likely cause of this decline in that infrastructure development in the region overall has simply not kept pace with other locations across the country, or that a basic level is simply taken for granted. Telecommunication needs have also changed over time, as companies have become more dependent on specialized technology needs such as website development which the city is less able to support or influence.

Best Operating Factors (n=18)
  Total 2008 Rank 1994 Rank
Quality of life 13 1 5
Highway access 7 2  
Availability of labor 7 2  
Quality of schools 6 4  
Telecommunications 4 5 1
Quality of local economic development sources 3 6 9
Labor force skills 3 6  
Air transportation 3 6 10
Access to suppliers 3 6 2
Utilities capacity 2 10 3
Other: 2 10  
Availability of bank loans 2 10 4
Company history 2 10  
Zoning 1   8
Road quality 1    
Energy costs 1   7
Availability of land, buildings 1    
Rail service 0    
Property taxes 0   6

Most Challenging Factors of Operating in the Region

As of 2008, property taxes are now viewed as the single most difficult factor of operating in the region. This indicates a significant challenge for Burlington and the surrounding community, as local governments must balance efforts to maintain services while retaining businesses and homeowners struggling with high property taxes. Zoning also remains a challenge, but the land and buildings are more available than they were in 1994, hopefully maintaining a balance that allows for sustainable development. Energy costs will continue to be an important factor in local businesses, particularly in the realm of transportation. That energy costs are now high on this list is consistent with the previous question regarding energy use and conservation and indicates that efforts to help companies reduce their energy bills may be more successful than past attempts have been.

Most Challenging Operating Factors (n=18)
  Total 2008 Rank 1994 Rank
Property taxes 13 1  
Labor force skills 10 2 10
Availability of labor 7 3 1
Energy costs 5 4  
Highway access 5 5 6
Zoning 5 5  
Access to suppliers 4 7  
Road quality 4 7 7
Air transportation 3 9 8
Availability of land, buildings 2 10 3
Quality of local economic development resources 2 10  
Telecommunications 2 10  
Utilities capacity 1    
Other: Using out-of-state contractors for in-state work 1    
Availability of bank loans 0    
Rail service 0   5
Quality of life 0    
Quality of schools 0   4

Conclusions

In today’s economy, Chittenden County businesses appear hesitant, as the slowing national economy and rising costs are leading to more cautious growth. While in 1994 projected 3-year growth was nearly double growth from the past 3-year period, in 2008 companies are projecting slower growth than took place from 2004-2007. However, this data projecting the number of new hires is likely somewhat skewed by the current perception of a national recession and its potential impacts. The years from 1994-1997 also involved the national economy’s recovery from the prior recession, explaining the period’s high employment growth rate.

Property taxes and energy costs are leading concerns for businesses, and some employers still find it difficult to recruit employees, particularly in technical fields. However, most feel the labor market is relatively strong and appreciate Burlington’s quality of life. Many companies have also already started or are open to support in reducing their energy costs.

The large companies surveyed have few financing problems and most plan to expand, but not in Burlington. As Chittenden County has become more developed, more of these companies are expanding to outside the region, although remaining in state. Most companies are either aware of or have used a number of the local business assistance organizations. Fewer than 10% had an unfavorable experience, and approximately two-thirds had a favorable experience with a given organization.

Recommendations

  • Support technical education and training efforts to provide workers with well-paying jobs and businesses with quality employees.

  • Continue to work with area businesses to reduce energy use and collaborate with organizations already working toward this goal such as BED, Efficiency Vermont, Vermont Gas, and the 10 Percent Challenge.

  • Continue efforts to take advantage of Burlington's quality of life and other assets to retain and recruit companies, using the existing network of business assistance organizations to address financial and technical challenges where possible.

  • Given the high level of concern about the property tax, efforts should be made, if possible, to correct any misconceptions about the relative area tax rate and to find other revenue sources which may serve as effective substitutes.

 

 

 

Page last updated March 29, 2010

Burlington, Vermont
 City Hall
Burlington City Hall, 149 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 2009 City of Burlington, Vermont