 |
|
 |
 |
In 2001, with support from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, Mt.
Auburn Associates published a national report on the economic vitality of
“hometown” or “third tier” small cities.[1]
This report focused on cities with populations between 15,000 and 110,000
(and with populations that have not tripled since 1950), cities that are also
primary to their regional economic base and that were incorporated before 1950.
Burlington was cited as one example of a city in this category that has
remained competitive in the new economy. Factors listed in the report as
contributing to “hometown” city successful economic development included:
- Enhancing local amenities – including waterfronts and arts and culture
- Building on local institutions of higher education
- Engaging in regional collaboration
- Creating an effective civic
infrastructure
- Promoting diversity as strength
Burlington has successfully used these strategies, in addition to others, to
create a number of economic development assets.
The Third-Tier Cities Report cited six primary economic development
challenges for small “hometown” cities:
- Out-of-date infrastructure – obsolete transportation systems,
brownfields, inadequate telecommunications infrastructure
- Dependence on traditional industry – over-reliance on one sector/large
employer(s), lack of economic diversity
- Transformation of their human capital base – “brain drains” (difficulty
retaining youth/attracting new residents)
- Declining competitiveness within their regions – out migration of people
and jobs, declining tax bases, centralization of poverty, declining
downtowns
- Weakened civic infrastructure and capacity – loss of local ownership
leading to loss of civic leadership, limited scale, limited regional
cooperation
- More limited access to resources – fewer philanthropic resources, less
private financing (debt and equity)
Burlington has confronted most of these issues over the last 30 years – some
successfully, with others continuing to pose challenges.
The City’s economic development strategies are based on four underlying
principles:
- Achieving economic vitality,
- Preserving and enhancing the environment,
- Promoting social equity, and
- Promoting local and continuing education.
The City acknowledges that businesses need the following to grow and prosper:
- Predictability (regulatory system, costs, taxes, energy)
- Access to Capital
- Increase Demand
- Infrastructure (transportation, telecommunications)
- Reduce Costs
- Quality of Life (housing, environment)
- Skilled Workforce
The City’s efforts usually involve collaborations and partnerships. The
Downtown Partnership, the South End Arts and Business Association, the
Burlington Business Association, the Lake Champlain Chamber of Commerce, and the
Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation (GBIC) participate often in a variety
of efforts to continue Burlington’s economic vitality. The Community & Economic
Development Office often works closely with other City Departments including the
Church Street Marketplace, City Arts, the Burlington Electric Department, the
Department of Public Works, the Parks and Recreation Department, Burlington Fire
Department and the Department of Planning and Zoning on supporting development
projects. Many of our projects are developed with collaborations of financing.
Often included are HUD, VEDA, the Vermont Development Credit Union, and other
lenders both private and public.
Burlington is participating in the development of a Regional Economic Plan.
Broadly, it is our intention to cooperate and work with the strategies as they
are developed for the Plan. The initial strategies identified for that Plan
include:
- Promote Workforce Development-Training for a High-Performance Regional
Economy
- Promote Infrastructure Readiness for Quality Job Creation-Retention
- Develop a Business-Economic Development Climate of
Cooperation-Helpfulness
- Promote Access to Affordable Capital for Regional Businesses
- Facilitate the Development of a Climate of Business Development
Cooperation in the Region
- Promote Business-Job Retention to Solidify the Regional Job Base
- Promote Strategic Business Expansion and Recruitment to Diversify the
Regional Job Base
- Facilitate “Technology” Incubators-Centers for Innovation
- Develop Options to Enhance Work Force Housing Options in the Northwest
Region
- Preserve-Enhance Regional Quality of Life
Burlington has very limited industrial land available for development. Many
successful small companies move to suburban communities as they grow and seek
larger, more modern facilities that are unavailable in the City. As a result,
the City nurtures small companies (which often hire residents within walking
distance or that take the bus), and then loses the jobs and tax base when those
companies are successful.
To offset these losses, the City must continue to foster new small businesses
and to find ways to support the expansion and retention of existing ones.
Redeveloping old buildings into shared, low-cost incubator space; targeting of
vacant buildings for the expansion of existing small businesses; and financing
and technical assistance programs to meet a range of business needs are some of
the tools for this strategy.
Additionally, the reuse of existing industrial land and facilities provides a
greater level of opportunity than previously existed. New technologies are
providing greater numbers of jobs and higher wage levels. More urban site
planning (including a willingness to provide parking decks) and structural
business changes make more dense commercial development – more jobs per square
foot - possible.
The South End Arts and Business District, centered on the Pine Street
corridor, is an example of how redeveloped industrial spaces gives young
businesses affordable room to start up and grow, provides opportunities to learn
from other tenants in the same “startup” stage of business life, allows for the
sharing of customers, suppliers, supplies and equipment with other tenants, and
provides a concentrated core of essential services to sustain small businesses.
The City will continue to support the development of this district.
The City can also fight urban sprawl by developing buildings within the City
(infill) and by rehabilitating vacant upper stories of existing buildings for
both housing and commercial use. Much of this space is not functional because it
is not currently accessible nor in compliance with current building codes. There
are, however, tax incentives available to help meet accessibility requirements
and bring buildings into compliance with building codes.
The economies of the City of Burlington and the surrounding cities and towns
are highly interdependent. Burlington plays a key role as the hub of business
services for regional businesses, as a major contributor to the quality of life
in the region that helps to attract and keep companies in the area, and
increasingly as a center of new enterprise development in the region. The
surrounding towns have the space that Burlington lacks for the attraction and
expansion of manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and firms that provide
critical employment opportunities for Burlington residents.
While the cultural, recreational, and entertainment amenities offered by the
City are a critical contributor to business formation and expansion, and thus
the growth of regional employment and tax revenues, the City does not fully
capture the benefits it generates. Its lack of industrial land means that the
tax revenues from facility expansions are often captured by surrounding
communities. At the same time, Burlington bears the budgetary burdens associated
with its high concentrations of low-income residents. This imbalance is
magnified by the high proportion of tax-exempt property within the City owned by
governmental, educational, religious, health care and other tax-exempt
organizations.
The close economic interdependency of the City of Burlington and surrounding
communities in the Burlington region – and the increasing focus on containing
and preventing sprawl - requires the incorporation of a regional perspective
into local economic development efforts. The City will continue to work with
regional planners to designate Burlington as the primary growth center in the
region, working to contain sprawl by absorbing a higher percentage of regional
growth in Burlington than in surrounding communities. Current tax structure,
permitting processes, and other regulations need to be examined and revised to
foster controlled, sustainable growth, equitable funding of services, and local
funding of public enhancements.
The regional balance of job growth and housing development is in many ways
mismatched. Much of the suburban job growth in the last decade has been in
low-wage retail employment while affordable housing remains largely concentrated
in the urban core cities of Burlington and Winooski. (The notable exception has
been the development of several hundred units of affordable housing in South
Burlington.) Public transportation is inadequate to bridge that disparity –
there is no fixed route service to many job locations (particularly areas in
Williston and Colchester which are experiencing rapid employment growth), and
service is not available for second and third shift work. Workers without cars
are shut out of many employment opportunities, but cannot afford to live within
walking distance of those opportunities. Most of this job growth is in areas
where there is almost no housing within walking distance.
Regional cooperation
on economic development has not historically been strong. However, greater
opportunities and incentives for regional cooperation now exist because of Act
60 and its changes to the local property tax structure. The state, which now
receives a majority of the local property taxes raised by municipalities, has
more reason to be concerned with local activities affecting the local tax base
and to develop programs that support local economic development. Municipalities,
retaining less of their local property revenues, have less reason to compete
with each other to attract businesses and more incentive to work cooperatively
to share the benefits and burdens of economic development.
With the advent of NAFTA and the progressive elimination of trade barriers
between Canada and the U.S., the quality-of-life factors that make Burlington
such an attractive location for American entrepreneurs are also likely to be
appealing to Canadian entrepreneurs seeking a U.S. business location. The City
can continue to explore ways to promote the City to those entrepreneurs, such as
the partnership with Plattsburgh and St. Jean (Quebec) known as the Triangle of
Excellence.
Burlington has a growing refugee and immigrant community. Cultural and
translation support is a critical issue for refugees and immigrants wanting to
start businesses. This is a separate expertise from providing business technical
assistance.
There is a need to tap into the cultural heritage of refugees and immigrants.
This is especially important in order to assist those refugees who face the
greatest “culture shock” upon moving to the US. They are going to use their own
culture as a path of assimilation into the larger culture. This tends to be
especially true for new refugee/immigrant businesses. We can support this by
promoting cultural diversity, for example, by encouraging ethnic business
sections in Burlington or elsewhere. A variation on this idea is to support
refugees’ pursuit of self-employment by working together in cooperative groups.
Agriculture is one example of where this might work. Nonetheless, there would
need to be a facilitator to translate ideas into action, and, of course, there
would need to be technical assistance available.
The State of Vermont needs to develop an office of immigrants, refugees and
New Americans so immigrants and others have a place to go in order to use and
access main stream services. Having a more diversified staff in state government
would support this process.
We need funding to develop a comprehensive database of refugees and
immigrants, and, ideally, to track how many convert to US citizenship and
patterns of population inflow and outflow. The current system does not capture
this information and needs to be changed.
Page last updated
April 04, 2008
|
 |
 |