|
The national Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a principal
revenue source for local communities to address the roots and consequences of
poverty. The HOME Investment Partnership program (HOME) is designed to create
affordable housing for low-income households through building, buying, and/or
rehabilitating housing for rent or homeownership. The
U.S. Department of Housing
& Urban Development (HUD) administers these programs on a national basis and
awards grants to entitlement communities - including the City of Burlington -
each year on a formula basis. The City in turn awards grants and loans to local
nonprofits as well as providing direct services to residents and businesses
through several CDBG-funded programs. The overall goal of these community
planning and development programs is to develop viable communities by providing
decent housing, providing a suitable living environment, and expanding economic
opportunities principally for low and moderate income persons.
The City – through the Community & Economic Development Office – regularly
prepares three major plans and reports about housing and community development.
First, there is the City’s Consolidated Plan for Housing & Community
Development. The Consolidated Plan covers a five-year time period and provides
detailed information about city demographics, the local housing market and the
local economy. It also outlines housing and community development needs and
priorities. The current Consolidated Plan covers the five-year period beginning
in July 2003.
Second, the City prepares an
Action Plan each year to address the
Consolidated Plan priorities. Each annual Action Plan details how the City plans
to spend local resources – and in particular, the CDBG and HOME resources that
the City receives from HUD – on specific activities.
Third, after the close of each program year, the City prepares a Consolidated
Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) to report on progress and on CDBG
and HOME expenditures during the year. The City is required to prepare the
Consolidated Plan, annual Action Plans and annual CAPERs in order to receive
funding from these HUD programs.
This CAPER is a detailed performance report on the City’s expenditure of CDBG
and HOME funds for the program year beginning July 1, 2005 and ending June 30,
2006 (referred to as Program Year 2005). It contains information on all CDBG and
HOME projects that were underway and/or completed during this program
year. The Report was prepared by the Community & Economic Development Office,
which administers Burlington’s CDBG and HOME programs.
Volume I of the CAPER is organized into four sections: Affordable Housing,
Economic Development, Social Services and Neighborhood Development. Each section
starts with overall outcome indicators and then becomes progressively more
specific, with first a summary of five-year projected cumulative results (or
“outputs”) from funded activities and actual results to date; then an overview
of results achieved this year; and finally a listing of activities on which
funds were spent this year, showing how each activity relates to the priority
needs identified in the City’s Consolidated Plan. Volume I also includes information on the City’s progress in
leveraging other public and private resources; a self-evaluation of program
effectiveness; and information on other actions described in the City’s
Consolidated and Action plans (including eliminating barriers to as well as
maintaining affordable housing; reducing lead paint hazards; overcoming gaps in
institutional structure and enhancing coordination; ensuring compliance with
program requirements; and reducing the number of people living in poverty).
Volume II of the CAPER contains a cover page, financial summary, and three
reports downloaded from HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System
(IDIS):
- Summary of Accomplishments Report. This report presents data on CDBG and
HOME activities and disbursements by priority need categories. It also
contains data on CDBG accomplishments by various units of measure and
housing units by racial/ethnic categories and HOME housing units by various
income groups.
- Summary of Consolidated Plan Projects for Report Year 2005. This report
tracks progress in implementing projects identified in the
2005 Annual Action
Plan portion of City’s Consolidated Plan for Housing & Community Development.
The report lists all projects for Program Year 2005 in sequence by project
number. Disbursements are summarized by program for each project’s activities.
Accomplishments reported for the program year are summarized for each program
area.
- Summary of Activities. This report lists each CDBG activity which was open
during Program Year 2005. It includes the status, accomplishments, program year
narrative and program year expenditures. Also shown is the activity code,
regulatory cite and characteristics of the beneficiaries. Please note that the
actual CDBG and Section 108 funds expended during Program Year 2005 are included
in the Accomplishments Narrative section of this report.
Volume II is not available online, but is available for review at the
Community & Economic Development Office.
The Community Development Block Grant program is one that
provides a great deal of local flexibility in the use of funds – and
the program is valuable because of that very flexibility. At the
same time, there is a need for national program accountability. To
facilitate the assessment of performance and tracking of results
nationally, HUD has adopted a uniform performance measurement
system. The new system will allow HUD to aggregate results across
the broad spectrum of local programs funded by these block grants so
that the impact of housing and community development programs can be
measured at the national level.
HUD’s performance measurement system combines the three statutory
objectives of the CDBG program - to provide decent housing, to
provide a suitable living environment, and to expand economic
opportunities - with three outcome categories:
Availability/Accessibility. This outcome category applies to
activities that make services, infrastructure, public services,
public facilities, housing, or shelter available or accessible to
low-and moderate-income people, including persons with disabilities.
In this category, accessibility does not refer only to physical
barriers, but also to making the affordable basics of daily living
available and accessible to low and moderate income people where
they live.
Affordability. This outcome category applies to activities that
provide affordability in a variety of ways in the lives of low- and
moderate-income people. It can include the creation or maintenance
of affordable housing, basic infrastructure hook-ups, or services
such as transportation or day care.
Sustainability: Promoting Livable or Viable Communities. This
outcome applies to projects where the activity or activities are
aimed at improving communities or neighborhoods, helping to make
them livable or viable by providing benefit to persons of low- and
moderate-income or by removing or eliminating slums or blighted
areas, through multiple activities or services that sustain
communities or neighborhoods.
The Summary of Annual Objectives organizes CDBG activities
according to the three statutory objectives and the three outcome
categories, and reports on progress according to the national
measurement system. We continue to use our local performance outcome
and output measures to track data and program results that are of
concern to us here in Burlington. Those local measures appear at the
beginning of the Affordable Housing, Economic Development, Social
Services and Neighborhood Development sections of the CAPER.
Residents are heavily involved in deciding how the City's Community
Development Block Grant resources will be spent. Since 1983, the City has
involved its citizens in its CDBG program through the
Neighborhood Planning
Assemblies (NPAs), semi-autonomous grassroots organizations existing in each of
the City’s seven wards.
The City sets aside 5% of its CDBG allocation each year for a
Neighborhood
Grants program. Residents of low and moderate-income neighborhoods develop
neighborhood improvement projects, bring those projects to their local
Neighborhood Planning Assembly for review, and then submit them to a
Neighborhood Grants Board. Each of the seven ward-based Neighborhood Planning
Assemblies elects a representative to the Neighborhood Grants Board, and the
Mayor sends two representatives. The Community & Economic Development Office
holds workshops to help residents develop applications.
All other applications
for CDBG funding are reviewed by the CDBG Advisory Board. Each Neighborhood
Planning Assembly elects a representative to the CDBG Advisory Board. Low-income
neighborhoods organized through the Burlington Neighborhood Project elect two
representatives to the Board. The Mayor sends three representatives, at least
one of whom lives in assisted housing. The State and the United Way also send a
representative. The members of the Community Development & Neighborhood
Revitalization Committee of City Council are non-voting members of the CDBG
Advisory Board. The Community & Economic Development Office holds workshops for
prospective community- and faith-based applicants to help them develop
applications.
A list of the funding proposals received each year is published
online for
public review, and all meetings of the CDBG Advisory Board and the Neighborhood
Grants Board are public meetings. The funding proposals themselves are available
for public review at the Community & Economic Development Office. After the recommendations of the CDBG Advisory
Board and the Neighborhood Grants Board are reviewed by the Mayor, the City
holds a public hearing before City Council on those recommendations, as well as
to gather broader input on housing and community development needs. The
recommendations become the backbone of the annual Action Plan. The Action Plan is published online as well as in hard copy for public
comment before it is approved by City Council and then submitted to HUD.
The CAPER is also published online as well as in hard
copy for citizen review and comment. A Public Hearing will be held before City
Council on September 18, 2006, to hear input on this CAPER as well as to gather
broader input on housing and community development needs.
Available CDBG and HOME funds, and expenditures, are shown below.
| Fund Source |
Budgeted Available |
Actual Available |
Committed |
Expended |
| |
|
|
|
|
| CDBG Entitlement Allocation |
$ 994,885 |
$ 994,885 |
|
|
| CDBG Reprogrammed Funds |
727,020 |
757,020 |
|
|
| CDBG Program Income |
92,000 |
140,029 |
|
|
| CDBG TOTAL |
$ 1,864,309 |
$ 1,891,934 |
$ 1,891,934 |
$ 1,143,012 |
| HOME Entitlement Allocation |
$ 539,816 |
$ 539,816 |
|
|
| HOME Recaptured Funds |
1,183,896 |
1,183,896 |
|
|
| HOME Program Income |
7,000 |
125,907 |
|
|
| HOME TOTAL |
$ 1,390,244 |
$ 1,849,619 |
$ 1,686,301 |
$ 580,681 |
The chart below illustrates the CDBG funds expended in each of the following
categories: Social Services, Housing, Economic Development and Neighborhood
Development.
 |
| Housing |
$ 324,810 |
| Economic Development |
$ 258,777 |
| Social Services |
$ 149,033 |
| Neighborhood Development |
$ 183,409 |
|
In general, grant activities have been effective and on schedule. The
activities are meeting the major goals outlined in the City’s Consolidated Plan,
and there were no changes in the program objectives for Program Year 2005. Subrecipient
contracts are reviewed and completed prior to disbursements (usually at the
beginning of each fiscal year), and grant disbursements are timely (usually
within two weeks of the request). The City continues to meet HUD’s timeliness
requirements for expenditures. One over-income household will be relocated on
the Callahan rehabilitation project; otherwise, no housing acquisition or
rehabilitation activities permanently displaced any households.
The City spent $226,983 of its CDBG expenditures and $67,272 in HOME
expenditures this year on general administration and planning activities. In
addition to financial management, grant administration and environmental
reviews, those activities include:
The Community & Economic Development Office facilitates and/or prepares
housing and community development related plans such as the
Consolidated Plan;
Affordable Housing Task Force Recommendations,
Action Plan and Annual Updates;
Moving Towards Home, the City’s 10-Year Plan for Ending Homelessness; and the
Burlington Family Report. CEDO also participates in community planning
and assessment initiatives such as the Chittenden County Housing Targets Task
Force; the Regional Plan for Early Childhood; the Agency of Human Services
District Leadership Team and Incarcerated Women Initiative; the Chittenden
County Substance Abuse Coalition; the Fletcher Allen Community Needs Assessment;
the
Substance Abuse,
Racism and Long Term
Care Study Circles; and the University of Vermont
Quality of Life Survey and
Genuine Progress Indicator work.
CEDO also participated in development of the
GBIC regional economic
development plan and is providing comments on the
revision
of the City’s zoning ordinance, currently underway.
As part of its administration and planning activities, the City monitors the
activities funded through its Community Development Block Grant and HOME
Investment Partnership Act programs to ensure that they are in compliance with
regulatory requirements, to discuss community needs and program challenges with
subrecipients, and to assess the effectiveness of funded activities. The
content of the monitoring plans for these programs are described in the City’s Consolidated
Plan.
CDBG subrecipient activities are monitored through program reports submitted
by subgrantees with each request for funds and through onsite visits. This year,
program staff made onsite visits to ReCycle North, King Street Youth Center,
Community Health Center, SafeSpace, Cathedral Square and Women Helping Battered
Women.
HOME subrecipient activities are monitored through annual project reports
submitted by subgrantees and through onsite visits. The purpose of the project
reports is to ensure that all HOME-assisted housing units meet federal
regulations for rent and income levels, as well as compliance with Housing
Quality Standards. This year, program staff made onsite visits to the Burlington
Community Land Trust, Cathedral Square Corporation and Lake Champlain Housing
Development Corporation.
On-site unit inspections are done to ensure that HOME-assisted
units are in compliance with the federal Housing Quality Standards
(HQS). All HOME-assisted rental units housing Section 8 tenants
and/or managed by one of our non-profit partners are inspected on a
periodic basis by BHA. In addition all rental units in the City of
Burlington are inspected annually by the inspectors from the City's
Code Enforcement Office. Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding
between the City of Burlington and the Burlington Housing Authority
(BHA), the City's minimum housing code is considered to be
substantially equivalent to HQS. HOME-assisted units in private
homes which are not tenanted by Section 8 voucher holders are
inspected by CEDO housing staff. As these private properties are
invariably less than 5-unit buildings, they are inspected every
three years.
The results of non-CEDO on-site inspections are gleaned from
BHA's quarterly inspection reports which contain the tenant name,
address, unit #, move-in date, inspection date, landlord and
Pass/Fail determination of almost every unit managed by one of our
HOME landlords. Any units with a status of "Annual Fail" are
routinely found to pass upon re-examination. The “Re-exam Pass”
status most often appears in the same quarterly report as the
“Annual Fail”. In those few instances where it doesn’t, our
experience has been that it appears in the next report. This office
receives the report via e-mail every quarter directly from BHA.
The City is committed to nurturing a strong nonprofit infrastructure. The
Community & Economic Development Office actively supports the participation of
community- and faith-based organizations in its CDBG program through annual
requests for applications and through workshops to help organizations develop
eligible and effective proposals. This year, CEDO administered 35 CDBG subgrants
to 22 different nonprofit agencies. CEDO also regularly researches and distributes
information on grant opportunities; assists in grant application efforts; and assists in grant administration
for community-based programs such as the Mental Health Court and the Supervised
Visitation Program.
CEDO also runs an AmeriCorps*VISTA program, which supports the local
nonprofit infrastructure through the activities of around 30 VISTA members
annually. A*VISTA members serve as “capacity builders” in nonprofit agencies and
as grassroots organizers in the community.
CEDO hosts monthly meetings of the local nonprofit housing developers and
actively participates in the monthly meetings of the Chittenden County Continuum
of Care to address homelessness; the Champlain Initiative (a countywide regional
partnership); the Early Childhood Council; and the
Legacy Project. CEDO also
actively participated in the recent series of discussions on
reorganizing the
Vermont Agency of Human Services.
The Community & Economic Development Office actively pursues additional
federal, state and foundation resources in support of City initiatives. CEDO
regularly researches information on grant opportunities, and pursues
opportunities such as the federal Renewal Community and Lead Hazard Reduction
applications and the state transportation grants supporting the North Street
project. CEDO also administers additional federal and state grants such as
Economic Development Initiative Special Project grants from the U.S. Department
of Housing & Urban Development. CEDO works with private funders as well; for
example, the City partnered with the Citizens Bank foundation, the Preservation
Trust of Vermont, and Brad Rabinowitz Architect to offer Façade Improvement
grants for commercial buildings in the North Street area. Subrecipients also
pursue additional funding resources, as CDBG and HOME typically represent small
(though vital) portions of a project budget.
We continue to be highly successful in using CDBG dollars to leverage other
funding to meet our community development goals. Overall, we leveraged over
$46
million in other public and private funding for projects this program year – a
ratio of 33:1 of dollars leveraged to CDBG dollars expended. Sources of
leveraged funds are shown in the Affordable Housing, Economic Development,
Social Services, and Neighborhood Development sections below.
Recognizing that poverty is a regional and national issue, and that many
factors contributing to poverty lie outside of local control, the City’s
overarching goal for its CDBG program is nonetheless to reduce the number of
people living in poverty in Burlington, and most especially those groups
disproportionately affected by poverty. As the CDBG Advisory Board develops its
funding recommendations, it rates applications on ten
resource allocation
principles designed to promote that goal and to set overarching priorities for
allocating investments among priority needs.
The City also works to reduce poverty through its
AmeriCorps*VISTA program.
Each year, around 15 AmeriCorps*VISTAs work with schools, colleges and family
literacy organizations to help ensure that all children read well and
independently by grade three. Another 15 members work in community development
to expand youth voice and opportunity, organize neighborhoods, create job and
skills-training opportunities, alleviate homelessness, and expand access to
healthcare.
The City has also brought together a group of local stakeholders
– which include the district offices of the Agency of Human
Services, the United Way and a diverse group of community- and
faith-based organizations – to develop a community focus on family
self-sufficiency and an accountability for using existing resources
in a unified, integrated way towards that goal. The group meets
monthly, looking for ways to expand systems of care/support (both
within and outside of the mainstream service system); to create,
sustain and honor relationships that successfully offer families
choices for change; and to respond more immediately, comprehensively
and flexibly to families’ needs.
These meetings led to a new initiative designed to help
low-income families access new resources, which was kicked off in
January. Based on the Circles of Support model developed in the
Mid-West, and operated by NeighborKeepers in partnership with a
group of six local social service agencies, each participating
family is matched with three trained “Allies,” typically
middle-class volunteers. Together, the family and its team of Allies
work on developing social and community connections, increasing
education and/or work skills, and building assets. The Allies in
turn learn first-hand about the barriers that these families face.
At weekly meetings held downtown in the First Baptist Church,
participants and Allies share success stories, help each other to
overcome obstacles, and participate in discussions with presenters
on topics such as credit, homeownership and banking. The project is
currently funded by the City, United Way, a local foundation and
private donors, with Champlain College providing the program
evaluation.
The City continued its participation in Round 1 of the National
League of Cities’ Family Asset Building initiative, and has
submitted a proposal to participate in Round 2. Through this
initiative, the City and its partners have had the opportunity to
see what other cities across the country are doing to increase the
net worth of low-income residents and to apply those lessons here at
home.
The City is also participating in the Creating Assets, Savings
and Hope (CASH) coalition, whose mission is to assist low and
moderate income Vermonters to realize their financial goals through
free tax assistance and asset building opportunities. Last November,
the Coalition participated in a Rural Family Economic Success
Institute co-sponsored by Casey Family Services and the Annie E.
Casey Foundation. Through the RuFES Institute, we shared ideas with
colleagues from New Hampshire and Maine as well as hearing about
best practices from around the country. The CASH Coalition has now
prepared an Asset-Building Action Plan for the upcoming year with
specific commitments from partners and a scheduled monthly review of
progress.
The City partnered with Northfield Savings Bank this year on a
bus advertising campaign for the Earned Income Tax Credit and free
tax preparation services. The City sponsored a Volunteer Income Tax
Assistance (VITA) site at City Hall for the first time, with City
staff serving as the site coordinator. Open a total of 32 hours over
nine weeks, the site served 136 clients. Of the 71% who responded to
an on-site survey, 73% were using VITA services for the first time.
The on-site survey also identified how people had heard about the
service, to improve outreach the following year. The City Hall site
worked with the other two local VITA sites on volunteer recruitment
and on outreach. Overall, at three local VITA sites, participation
increased from around 800 last year to over 900 this year. And,
Opportunities Credit Union developed an alternative Refund
Anticipation Loan product that was available to VITA clients.
The CASH Coalition held a “Free Credit Score Day” at City Hall in
March. Promoted to VITA clients, the event offered free credit
scores (obtained and paid for by Northfield Savings Bank) together
with one-on-one interpretation/counseling on the associated credit
reports and workshops on budgeting, saving and checking accounts.
Twenty-three people participated in the one-on-one counseling
sessions. We plan to repeat this event.
The Community & Economic Development Office is the principal municipal agency
responsible for the City’s anti-poverty efforts.
Page last updated
July 25, 2007
|